About your Search

20140226
20140306
Search Results 0 to 2 of about 3 (some duplicates have been removed)
when clinton began the movement of nato against russia, a movement that's continued. even if we go back to november, a few months ago when the protesters came into the streets into ukraine. putin said to europe and washington, why are you forcing ukraine to choose between russia and europe? we're prepared with europe to do a mini-marshal plan to bail ukraine out. let's do it together. that was refused by washington and brussels and led to the situation today. one last point, the worst outcome, you asked michael, and he didn't say, but he said what he didn't want, the worst outcome because we hear this clamor in washington and hear it in europe is a movement in response to what putin's done in crimea to move nato forces to the polish ukrainian border. if we do that, putin will certainly bring troops in from russia itself. the troops in crimea seem to be troops that were based at the naval base -- >> woodruff: and -- -- and then you will have a real confrontation. >> woodruff: is this something putin made up his mind to do or is there room for a negotiated settlement, a go-between, perhap
for a single tax since 1993, before 1993, starting with bill clinton. so you know, i thought it showed imagination. >> woodruff: but it's not going anywhere. >> i was very disappointed in the speaker's reaction, blah, blah, blah, which was-- an insult to somebody that spent some real work on it, no, it isn't going to go anywhere, judy, because something like this takes a gestation period of three, four years and a lot of work. dave camp began the work. >> ready for mark's smear on seminars. i thought it was a good step forward. like mark, it's a step. at he not going to pass, but it's a step. and a step for some of the reasons mark said. buts it was a republican plan that preserved the progressivity of the tax code and maybe even increased it a little. and a plan that is revenue neutral but a plan that would produce amazing economic benefits if enacted. if the democrats want to come in and say we'll adopt a similar strategy, maybe we want a little more revenue, then you really could begin to have a negotiation or at least you would if we lived in a normal political system. but i though
Search Results 0 to 2 of about 3 (some duplicates have been removed)